The Brontës started it all.
Freestyle roleplaying, fluff writing, imagi-nations, fan fiction, and my own love of toy soldiers and gaming.
Blame them for this blog.
The real culprit is the late Pauline Clarke, whose other books I really should read sometime. But I've never quite been able to get over this one. It remains, far and away, my favorite children's novel.
![]() |
| With Armies in Plastic Waterloo figures. |
8-year-old Max Morley and his family have just moved to a house in the Yorkshire countryside not far from Haworth, the home of the Brontës as children. He discovers a set of twelve century-old wooden toy soldiers in the attic.
At about the same time, his family stores in the attic artifacts brought from West Africa by their great-grandparents, who were missionaries to the Ashanti. The artifacts are a stool purported to be a throne, a model canoe, and a drum.
This will all be relevant to the story, I promise. The drum first, because Max sets up the soldiers and plays it for them to march to. To his surprise, they literally come alive before his eyes and, well, march - for a handful of seconds before turning wooden again.
Max is a cautious, mature lad. He experiments with the soldiers and the drum, and while the rest of the family is out, gets them to open up to him. To his surprise, they claim to have been to Ashanti, which is why they recognize the drum. Their leader, Butter Crashey, aged 140, proposes to explore the house under Max's protection. Max, enchanted, agrees.
Max doesn't play with the soldiers, as such. He follows them as they do what toy soldiers would do (I can't help thinking that the makers of Toy Story read this book at some point, because the opening sequence with the green army men is almost this chapter writ on the screen). They climb down a stairwell on a rope (a ball of string tied up by Max); wade through a carpet like high grass; swarm up a curtain cord like the rope of a ship; march up and down on a piano to play music; eat some of Max's food; and are accidentally scattered when the rest of the family return. One, Stumps, is lost in the confusion.
Max subconsciously guides the soldiers, almost without realizing. When he finds Stumps the next night, he rescues the small soldier literally by thinking about it. Wouldn't it be nice if Stumps would climb the creeper that goes up by his window, Max imagines, instead of just grabbing him up and carrying him back to the attic - and as he does so, Stumps runs for the creeper. By this time, Max has recognized his responsibility for the soldiers, and accepted their title of "genius" for his imaginative role. They explain that they were long ago guided by four other Genii - Brannii, Tallii, Emmii, and Annii...
The adult supporting character who teaches the children about the Brontës is himself an authority on them; he is a parson, of the same parish that Patrick Brontë held sway over during the Brontes' childhood, and like Patrick Brontë has three daughters and a son. He points out that the soldiers, all individuals, yet take on aspects of their "creators." Branwell's own Sneaky is mischievous and moody, but was the first to wake; Charlotte's Duke of Wellington is the strong, silent heroic type she loved in her stories; Gravey is unhappy and easily bullied, like Emily. He also counterpoints the religious parallels of the story - at one point the Twelves are guided on their journey by a "pillar of fire" - a bicycle lamp. In an afterward, American author Katherine Paterson (known for the religious themes in her books) notes these especially; Branwell in his stories depicts himself and his sisters as giant gods from the Twelves' point of view, and Max's ability to guide the soldiers via his own thoughts is akin to God's omniscience. One wonders what the Reverend Patrick Brontë might have thought of his children's self-identification.
"Max thought he would like to protect all the creatures, and wondered who did. His duty now was to protect Stumps."
There is an element of "imagi-nations" and fan-fiction that prefigures that of the 21st century. I can only imagine what the real Duke of Wellington would have thought of the Brontës' version of him - though in their stories he remains conqueror of Napoleon, he also becomes conqueror of Africa. Perhaps they were inspired by his conquest of India?
There is also discussion of the joy of play:
"And there are two more letters, one saying that there will always be wars while human nature is what it is, and why shouldn't boys play with soldiers?"
'Boys will be boys,' it says, 'and girls will join them in such military games, whether they are Branwell Brontë and his sisters, or the children who buy lead or bright plastic soldiers today. Battle, struggle and adventure against enemies are part of the pattern of living, it seems, and much as we all now hate war, they look as if they will go on being. Until men are perfect in humanity they will fight.'" This seemed a solemn letter and there was a pause.
This is interesting given the bloody adventures the soldiers once had (which they repeat with relish to Max) and the ones they go on under his direction. As a child, this guided my own play in the garden - to an extent, because I was a pretty literal thinker and it wasn't until adulthood that I read the original stories and really grasped how the Brontë children created the world that their soldiers lived in.
In the soldiers' own dialogue, Clarke quotes Branwell's own descriptions of the soldiers, for example in a sequence where Butter Crashey, their leader, describes their characteristics to the eager, curious Max. He speaks here with Branwell's voice, reflecting his and their "genesis" in Branwell's own writing.
Branwell's first story about the soldiers, The History of the Young Men, written when he was not quite thirteen, contains all the gruesome violence and fantastic impossibility you might expect of a modern bad-fanfic writer, the sort to be mocked by fans of Mystery Science Theater 3000 today. The soldiers (all thirteen of them) defeat in pitched battle, indeed outright massacre, a Dutch garrison of 400 on Ascension Island, at a cost of seven dead to themselves. You can hear the boyish glee as Branwell describes the slaughter (of women and children). They later defeat an Ashanti army of 13,000.
![]() |
| Straight out of a "Boy's Own" imagination. |
Six of the dead are next made alive again by Cheeky the surgeon. A bit of magical thinking here, yet the seventh is still missing and cannot be found. Real life, I suspect, took a hand here, in the same way that real objects come to life in the minds of the Twelves and their Genii. (For example, Stumps describes the curved plumbing trap beneath the kitchen sink, where he shelters, as a "great white creeper, in the crook of which he was safe"). When Frederick dies permanently, he is replaced by Stumps, who was found again. They are mysteriously described as "two people in one," and Branwell's notes indicate that names and characters of several of the soldiers were simply changed. Stumps is a viewpoint character and Max's own favorite because of his mysterious background, and because he is used to getting lost and found again.
Many stories of this nature, of course, focus on the secret of magic, tiny people, or both. Katherine Paterson compares this book to Mistress Masham's Repose by T.H. White, in which Lilliputians are discovered by a child in 1940s Britain, and notes that because the protagonist is less responsible than Max, and nearly gets the Lilliputians discovered or lost, her story is funnier and scarier. A modern classic along these lines is The Indian in the Cupboard, in which plastic figures come to life; their "owner," Omri, learns very quickly that the figures are real, historical people who can die if he is not careful, but his friend Patrick never quite gets this, treats them as toys regularly, and nearly gets them or himself killed more than once. This series is sometimes terrifying, and becomes more "adult" as it goes on.
The Return of the Twelves is different in that the Twelves are regarded in-universe as toys. They are still people, of course, but Max subconsciously plays with them, and their inherent nature as creations of creative literary minds is always at the fore of the story. It is magical realism that differentiates this story from most "tiny people" stories - it's more about the power of imagination to make things real, perhaps in the same vein as The Velveteen Rabbit.
As the Twelves explore Max's home, then set out across the wide world (read: a few miles of country to Haworth), the world around them so small and innocuous to Max and his siblings becomes vast and adventurous. A small but burbling creek becomes a vast river; a field of wheat is a jungle or forest; a roller-skate becomes a gun-carriage; a piece of string becomes a rope; a bag of marbles becomes cannon balls (which are hurled at a large, brown furry monster which turns out to be friendly and leads the Twelves through its underground lair - a rabbit); tiny chicken feathers become ostrich plumes for decorating hats.
![]() |
| Twelves on the march through a field. |
There is great inspirational value in this book, not just for wargaming but roleplaying too. It's taught me to see almost anything I look at as a seed for adventure. RPGs like Mouse Guard and Army Ants in which animal characters have their own societies and weapons, but live in a world scaled for much bigger creatures, have incredible potential scope. I can develop stories for these games just by going outside and lying down - and children do just that in this book, glimpsing through the grass the forever adventurous Twelves.





Interesting post. You are quite right in that almost anything can provide a catalyst for gaming inspiration.
ReplyDeleteI have the automatic habit of free-association, which helps enormously with my game-mastering. Unfortunately, it also means I have almost too many ideas and projects to track. Everything I see gives me an idea; every blogpost makes me want to try something new.
DeleteBranwell and Charlotte Bronte would have made excellent game-masters.
Ive never heard of this book. It sounds enchanting. I might get around to reading it one day. Sadly time is the enemy of the child of 8 and 50.
ReplyDeletePS thank you for bringing it to my/our attention.
DeleteGood luck finding it - it won the Carnegie Medal so British libraries at least should be able to get it for you thru interlibrary loan at least. In the US, the only real option is ebay.
DeleteSecond hand paperback copies of this Pauline Clarke book should be affordable around on eBay etc, Abe books etc.
DeleteI just found and ordered one on Abe books uk for less than the price of a modern paperback including postage! Looking forward to reading it very much after learning about it here.
DeleteAnd my degree in library science proves its worth... haha! I hope you enjoy it.
DeleteHi Jennifer -
ReplyDeleteIf you enjoy 'small worlds', you might also find interesting Terry Pratchett's 'Carpet People' and his 'Bromeliad' trilogy. You might also find entertaining Lloyd Osbourne's article 'Stevenson at Play', published in Scribner Magazine in 1898. The account of an attic war written as a series of 'News Items' and 'Op Eds' really brings their world to life.
Cheers,
Ion A. 'Archduke Piccolo' Dowman
My own war gaming comes I think from a love of small imaginary worlds, associated with a love of history, both of which go back to when I was still at primary school.
Ion,
DeleteThanks! I've read Stevenson at Play in one of John Curry's books, but while I love Discworld I haven't read Carpet People or the Bromeliad. Will certainly look into them.
Jennifer -
DeleteThe titles of the 'Bromeliad Trilogy' are
'Truckers'
'Diggers'
'Wings'
The allusion to bromeliads is to be found in one of the novels, but I forget which!
Cheers,
Ion
Jinx - same thought! I was also going to recommend The Carpet People by Terry Pratchett. When I was reading it, I was trying to work how on earth to scale everything down to this microscopic level of dust and carpet forests and now on earth would I make carpet tuft trees?
DeleteI remember reading The Secret House and The Secret Garden by David Bodanis - detailed, microphoto-rich books about the life and invisible things all around us. There was a whole chapter on dust mites.
DeleteMark -
DeleteI had the same idea of scaling. You will recall that at one point in the carpet 'forest' there is a 'white wall'. I have inferred this to be a discarded and forgotten matchstick. As I was reading the book, I figured on my living room being the size of Australia.
It has been a very long time since I read the book, and I don't have a copy, but I'll suppose here that the average height of a male adult carpet-person would be roughly 0.175mm that is to say one ten-thousandth of of ours. There's our scale 1:10000. Maybe I should go down a factor of 10, but let's go with this.
The room I'm now sitting is is quite small, maybe a little bigger than 3m x 4m. In my suggested carpet people dimensions, we're looking at 30km x 40km. I have a bit of a notion that the time scale would be the square root of the ground. So 1 of our minutes would be 100 of theirs - an hour and 40 minutes. A little over 3.5 days out time would represent close to a year of theirs; one of our years is a carpet people century.
Cheers,
Ion
The comic and RPG Army Ants is like this - players are encouraged to use their home or backyard as the setting, where a meter is a kilometer and a month is a year, a lawn is a jungle and a sandbox becomes a desert. It is entirely possible in this game to roleplay a foraging party of ants out to steal the snacks the human players are eating.
DeleteInteresting post Jennifer. I shall look out for this book.
ReplyDeleteMy eldest asked for “Glass Town “ as a graduation present recently.
Glass Town is a lovely graphic novel. I've noticed most of the books that reference the juvenilia focus on the later parts of it (which, granted, are more exciting and expansive) - Angria and its assorted countries and family squabbles which were apparently Charlotte's favorite part to create.
DeleteAngria / Glasstown may be the most complete, Gondal and Gaaldine are much more sketchy and fragmented.
DeleteSmall World Fiction like the Twelves often uses is a literary riddle trick of describing something familiar in strange ways, as if you are seeing or describing it for the first time, as if it was making or naming a familiar thing afresh, I think the Russian formalists called it ostranenie or defamiliarisation - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamiliarization
ReplyDeleteA Martian sends a postcard Home by Craig Raine is a famous poem version of defamiliarisation. https://www.poetrybyheart.org.uk/poems/a-martian-sends-a-postcard-home/
Science fiction is full of this comic trick, explorers coming across in the future 'old tech' or our objects from today that they don't know what it does. Mortal Engines trilogy is full of this.
I think there is an element of that defamiliarisation going on in small world fiction - the Twelves do not know what the roller skate is or the marbles etc but they know what they can do with it. it is the illustration or the description that helps the reader work out what the object finally really is.
To a certain extent small children and stroke / dementia patients have this 'poetic' way of talking round the proper word for the object. Children misuse objects in play in the same basis, they see it in their own terms, not adult ideas of what is right, correct etc.
Thank you for this detailed discussion of the Bronte juvenilia.
All of this as you say is the "seed for adventure".
By the way I am purposefully avoiding my long awaited review of The Twelves book long enough, it is now years overdue, on the basis that the day I finally get around to this Twelves review post is probably a signal that it is the end of times ... putting it off keeps us all alive that little bit longer! This procrastination is my simple gift to humanity.
Half the reason I ended up writing this, I think, is because you haven't!
DeleteSome of Isaac Asimov's best short stories are in this vein, where you eventually realize the speaker you assumed was a male human was a female or alien. Tanya Huff does this in her fantasy novels too - she'll describe a guard or a secretary and only later do you realize the guard is a woman and the secretary a man.
For people's reference, here are some of my "gaming the Bronte juvenilia" posts on this page of my blog https://manoftinblog.wordpress.com/gaming-the-bronte-family-imaginations-of-glasstown-angria-gondal-and-gaaldine/
ReplyDelete